Loading...

Escenarios y árboles de decisión ilimitados para sus evaluaciones estratégicas

Nuestros planes
Actualizado en mayo 8, 2024

Advertencias

Lectura estimada: 5 minutos 216 puntos de vista

Warning 1101

The Force Mining surface (S1) was initially above the topography. Correction applied: S1 has been projected onto the level of the topography.

Warning 1102

The Force Mining (FM) surface used was initially below the economically viable ultimate pit. Correction applied: FM depth has been reduced by increasing its Z-level.

Warning 1103

The Force Mining surface (S1) used for period X was initially above the one (S2) used for the same period. Correction applied: the elevation of S1 has been reduced to match S2.

Nota: ‘X’ can represent any period value (1, 2, 3, etc)

Warning 1104

The Force Mining surface (S1) employed was initially below the Restrict Mining surface (S2) during period X. Correction applied: S1 has been adjusted upward to align with the elevation of S2.

Nota: ‘X’ can represent any period value (1, 2, 3, etc)

Warning 1105

The restrict mining surface used violated slope constraints of the ultimate pit. Correction applied: the surface has been adjusted accordingly.

Warning 1106

The force mining surface used violated slope constraints of the ultimate pit. Correction applied: the surface has been adjusted accordingly.

Warning 1107

The force mining surface (S1) imported for the ultimate pit was initially below the restrict mining surface (S2) imported for the same purpose. Correction applied: the elevation of S1 has been increased to align with that of S2.

Warning 1108

The restrict mining surface (S1) imported for the ultimate pit was initially above the force mining surface (S2) imported for the same purpose. Correction applied: the elevation of S1 has been decreased to align with that of S2.

Warning 1109

The force mining surface (S1) did not initially provide sufficient space to meet minimum operational constraints. Correction applied: adjustments have been made to S1 in critical areas.

Warning 1110

The restrict mining surface (S1) was initially below the origin Z level. Correction applied: S1 has been projected to align with the origin Z level.

Warning 1111

The force mining surface (S1) was initially below the origin Z level. Correction applied: S1 has been projected to align with the origin Z level.

Warning 1112

The edges of the restrict mining surface (S1) were initially below the topography level. Correction applied: the edges of S1 have been projected to align with the topography level.

Warning 1113

The edges of the force mining surface (S1) used were initially below the topography level. Correction applied: the edges of S1 have been projected to align with the topography level.

Warning 1114

The restrict mining surface (S1) used was initially above the topography. Correction applied: S1 has been projected to align with the topography level.

Warning 1115

The restrict mining (RM) surface utilized was initially above the economically viable ultimate pit. Correction applied: the depth of RM has been increased by reducing its Z-level.

Warning 1116

The restrict mining surface (S1) used for period X was initially below surface S2 used in the same period. Correction applied: the elevation of S1 has been increased to match that of S2.

Nota: ‘X’ can represent any period value (1, 2, 3, etc)

Warning 1201

Slope angles for the restrict mining surface have been adjusted for period X.

Nota: ‘X’ can represent any period value (1, 2, 3, etc)

Warning 1202

Slope angles for the force mining surface have been adjusted for period X.

Nota: ‘X’ can represent any period value (1, 2, 3, etc)

Warning 2301

The vertical rate has been adjusted by N meters to adhere to production and/or surface constraints in period X.

Nota: ‘X’ can represent any period value (1, 2, 3, etc). ‘N’ can represent any value in meters.

Warning 2401

The production capacities informed may force a mining schedule with more than 100 periodos. Quieres continuar de todos modos?


This warning message is designed to prevent users from spending time on incorrect scenario setups by flagging potential inconsistencies with the block model data.

It often occurs due to typos, such as inputting values with lower magnitudes than intended. Por ejemplo, if production is meant to be 10 millón tons per year but is mistakenly entered as 10 thousand tons per year. MiningMath conducts basic validation checks before each scenario optimization, comparing parameters like production limits with the available material. If values are significantly lower than expected, it triggers a warning, as it may result in an unrealistically long mine life, typically over 100 años.

Warning 2402

The block model must have at least two Economic Value fields, one for process and another one for dump.


MiningMath requires at least one process and one dump destination with their respective economic values. You should analyze your model and be sure to have this fields.

The economic value calculation is one of most important procedures of MiningMath. Any error on the formula could cause incompatible results and even increase the complexity and runtime based on wrong assumptions that could be done based on these values. The main validations on this step could be done by evaluating the minimum and maximum values. Once the data has been imported you can also perform a data validation procedure.
Próximo- Problemas comunes Números de punto flotante
Comparte este documento

Advertencias

O copiar enlace

CONTENIDO
Icono de chat

Hola, es mima aquí 😇 Hazme cualquier pregunta!